• Posts Tagged ‘Trends’

    A small case study of New York based corporations on reporting systems

    Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

    This case study includes corporations with its headquarters in New York. In the small sample there are corporations like: PEPSICO, Thomson Reuters, WPP, LVMH and others.

    It was interesting that in many cases, the LinkedIn proved to be valuable source of the information where are the headquarters of some of the corporations. Like, if I search for our company Vizuarna headquarters, the first result on Google is the Vizuarna’s profile on LinkedIn. Interesting, isn’t it? The same way it is possible to find some other corporations headquarters. And yes. Many of the worlds most known corporations actually have their headquarters in New York. Not necessary in New York City but still.

    And after studying the reporting systems of some of the corporations in New York, what have I found out? The most important lesson: all of them have actually a reporting system established. No mistakes. Some have appointed even executives director for investment affairs. What were some of the best features in this reports in my opinion? Three things really to remember:

    + first, one of the corporation studied has its interactive annual report made already in 2003. And the reports are published on the web site as way back as in 1999. And everything about the annual report is totally integrated into the site. Really remarkable. Interactive version made rather simple like a flash publication but with good possibilities of printing, mailing and others, be that the whole report or its part by pages.

    + second, promise of the annual report, let say some kind of tactical tag-line, a sort or even really a brand promise explained in short and in details. That’s the way to do it. and

    + third, the whole annual report presented in a summary. All the chapters are there but everything is in short. Really in short but with all relevant information. What do I really need to know about the income statement? There are really only 2×3 things to know. Revenues (in sales, financial, other) and expenses in the other way (again operations, financial and other) and that’s it. And some make even a summary from the summary. Shorter version of the short version. And that is true for other chapters of the annual report as well. That way it becomes more interesting for larger target groups not only for people who have to read the reports by duty. Enhanced transparency, I would called it.

    The web page of the LVMH web site presenting annual reports for ten years

    Interactive annual report of Pepsico wits its promise in detail

    Interactive annual report summary of WPP

    the results from Google on the term Vizuarna headquarters

    There are some other things to be mentioned, like sharing possibilities on SlideShare or some reports really followed the line throughout the years. Just like their corporate strategy is to be followed (if successful), so have the annual reports its design consistency.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Gmail pri Google apps

    Monday, April 12th, 2010

    Gmail (Google elektronska pošta) se je v zadnjih letih močno razširil tako na fizične osebe kot tudi na pravne. Tako ima sedaj vsaka gospodarska družba možnost brezplačno ustvariti  do 50 elektronskih naslovov s svojo domeno. Seveda je storitev možno tudi nadgraditi z doplačilom. Ob elektronskih naslovih z lastno domeno, so zraven tudi drugi Google-ove programi, kot recimo Calendar, Docs… Več o tem najdete na strani http://www.google.com/apps/. Z preprosto prijavo hitro pridemo da administratorske konzole, kjer imamo možnost nastavitve lastnega znaka družbe in druge podobne zadeve. Ko je vse nared prestavimo trenutne MX strežnike na Google-ove in ob osvežitvi domen, naš novi sistem že deluje.

    Med samo postavitvijo sistem sem naletel na različne težave. Recimo eden večjih je bila HTML podpis za elektronsko pošto. Namreč z nastavitvami, ki nam jih ponuja sistem je možno nastaviti le tekstoven (t.i. »plain«) podpis. Za take reči obstaja ogromno rešitev toda vsaka ima manjšo pomanjkljivost… Recimo “plugin” za Mozilla Firefox z imenom Wisestamp, onemogoči, da si lahko sami v sporočilu nastavljamo barve. Vendar sem po nekaj preizkusih prišel do zaključka, da je trenutno najboljša rešitev zaznamek (“bookmark”), ki nam ga pomaga narediti skripta na strani http://projets.geekfg.net/.

    Brezplačna različica sistema Google apps ponuja le 7GB prostora za shranitev emailov. To ni nevemkako veliko, saj se kmalu predal napolni (odvisno od pridobljenih priponk). Res je sicer, da pa največji problem še vedno ostajajo vdori. Sploh popularni so na večjih brezplačnih aplikacijah, kjer imajo nadobudneži izzive. Obstajajo številni blog zapisi kako so vdrli v elektronski predal, pobrali pomembne podatke… Toda to je problem na katerega sami ne moremo vplivati kaj veliko…

    So pa seveda tudi velike prednosti, saj ko je elektronska pošta postavljena, ne rabimo nobenega administratorja za dodajanje uporabnikov, spreminjanje njihovih pravic in imamo zelo malo možnosti da se bo sesul strežnik ali storitev na kateremu se izvaja delovanje. Podpira tudi IMAP strežnik, kar je mnogim ključnega pomena.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    I can’t write when it rains

    Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

    Why corporate design should be viewed as a investment?

    Monday, January 19th, 2009

    It would be an honour if I would be the author of that answer but I’m not. Rennat Van Cauwenberge, General Manager/Managing Partner from Gramma in the article Corporate design instrument for change, wrote:
    “Above all, corporate design is an instrument for transformations and, at the same time, a guarantee of continuing corporate recognition. A design that is new, surprising and historically consistent, and that corresponds to the basic motives of the employees? Few advertising agencies can handle this paradox. Most of them see a given cultural context as oppressive. By fits and starts, they like to present changes and breaks in trends in a corporate design as ‘progress’. The client does not benefit from this in the least. The internal and external images of the organisation are even more confused than they were. But the biggest mistake is the break with the perception that has been carefully built up in the minds of hundreds of thousands, even millions of observers. This collective perception belongs to the intangible assets of a company. For this reason alone, corporate design should be given the attention that is give to every other area of investment.”

    Source: Hans P Brandt (ed): Identity 2.0

    Marko Savić, managing director at Vizuarna, strategic design consultancy. Design manager and corporate identity consultant.